Royal journalist Sarah Louise Robertson took purpose on the Duke of Sussex.
GB Information aired a humiliating blow for the prince (Picture: Getty)
GB Information was halted to challenge a devastating blow to Prince Harry after he resigned from his charity Sentebale – which is now suing him for defamation. The prince is being sued alongside former trustee Mark Dyer as a result of an alleged “hostile media marketing campaign”, although Harry strongly denies all of the accusations.
Dwell on the programme this weekend, royal journalist Sarah Louise Robertson didn’t maintain again in her evaluation of Harry’s woes, as she mentioned: “It’s all acquired very, very messy. I don’t know if you happen to keep in mind however a few 12 months in the past, March final 12 months, Prince Harry dramatically resigned, together with [former trustee] Mark Dyer, as one of many chairs of his charity Sentebale.
“He set this charity up 19 years in the past, it was in honour of his late mom Princess Diana. The identify of it means ‘neglect me not’, and possibly he desires to neglect all of this however he can’t, as a result of he’s being dragged into the Excessive Court docket and sued for defamation, for libel, by the charity that he based.”
Robertson went on: “It’s due to an enormous fallout with its chair Sophie Chandauka. It was stunning when this all got here out final 12 months, these allegations.
“There was principally an influence battle between Harry and Sophie. She accused him and Mark of principally spreading unfounded claims, misogyny, there was a component of racism introduced in as effectively, sexism… These had been all allegations that Harry has strongly denied.
“He resigned, Mark resigned and a load of the trustees resigned. With the funds which might be left, Sophie is now hitting Harry the place it hurts and attempting to go for his deep pockets.”
She concluded: “So I don’t understand how that is going to play out, as a result of there are simply so many gray areas. He mentioned, she mentioned. However actually one thing has gone flawed someplace.”
A spokesperson for Prince Harry and Mark Dyer mentioned: “They categorically reject these offensive and damaging claims,” including that the charity ought to as a substitute focus its efforts on the communities it helps, moderately than pursuing authorized motion.
Leave a Reply