Blue Labour founder Lord Glasman has turn out to be essentially the most senior Labour determine to demand Sir Keir Starmer’s resignation over the Mandelson vetting scandal
Starmer has even confronted calls to resign from members of his personal occasion (Picture: Getty)
Essentially the most senior Labour determine but has reportedly damaged ranks to demand Sir Keir Starmer’s resignation, declaring the Prime Minister has made his place unattainable by refusing to confess he was incorrect.
Maurice Glasman — the peer and political thinker who established the Blue Labour motion — is known to have stated that Sir Keir had backed himself right into a nook from which there was no escape.
We use your sign-up to supply content material in methods you have consented to and to enhance our understanding of you. This will likely embody adverts from us and third events based mostly on our understanding. You’ll be able to unsubscribe at any time. Learn our Privateness Coverage
He’s reported to have stated: “If you cannot personal your errors, you possibly can’t transfer. All he wanted to say was ‘we made an error’. However he is utterly caught in saying he hasn’t executed something incorrect, so this will’t go away. It is as simple as that, actually.”
Pressed on whether or not the Prime Minister ought to go, Lord Glasman was allegedly unequivocal. “He can’t conceivably proceed as a reputable Prime Minister any longer. And that is all as a result of he can’t say ‘I made a mistake, I am sorry’.”
Vetting scandal
The intervention comes as Sir Keir faces mounting fury over the revelation that intelligence officers had formally beneficial in opposition to granting Lord Mandelson safety clearance earlier than he was put in as Britain’s ambassador in Washington, stories The Telegraph. The Prime Minister has stood agency on his declare that he was by no means knowledgeable the vetting course of had produced an antagonistic discovering.
That place has drawn scepticism from inside his personal ranks. Sir Keir has individually conceded that he went forward with the Mandelson appointment whereas already conscious of the peer’s friendship with Jeffrey Epstein — a concession that has solely deepened the questions surrounding his decision-making.
The timing might hardly be worse. A management problem was already being overtly mentioned forward of native elections now lower than three weeks away, with projections suggesting Labour might shed as much as 2,000 seats on Might 7.
Lord Glasman isn’t any far essentially the most senior member of Labour’s ranks to publically name for Starmer to go (Picture: Chris McAndrew / UK Parliament)
A warning that went unheeded
Lord Glasman had tried to go off the disaster months earlier than it exploded into public view. Early in 2025 he put his issues in writing, sending a memo on to Morgan McSweeney — at that time Sir Keir’s most senior aide, who would later depart his put up over the identical scandal — setting out the hazards posed by Mandelson’s Epstein associations and calling on each males to desert the nomination totally.
His verdict on the peer on the time was blunt: “the incorrect man on the incorrect time within the incorrect place.”
His warnings went unheeded. Talking on Sunday, he made clear he believed the implications had been now unavoidable.
“So how important is it? He [Sir Keir] continues to be stumbling on with all this, however it’s simply not going to go wherever. Might 7 goes to be one other debacle. I am unable to see how he carries on after the Might elections.
“He might limp on to the summer season however the level is we’re doing all this whereas there is a struggle in Iran, there is a struggle in Ukraine and the place is the political management?”
Downing Road pointed Sunday to remarks Sir Keir made in March through which he accepted private duty for the Mandelson determination. The Prime Minister stated on the time: “It was me that made the error… and it is me that makes the apology to the victims of Epstein.”
The importance of Lord Glasman’s name for resignation extends past his private views. Because the architect of Blue Labour — a motion that has repeatedly pressed Sir Keir to take tougher traces on welfare, defence spending and migration — his public break with the Prime Minister indicators a rupture that stretches properly past the Westminster village.
Leave a Reply