Former boxer David Haye is alleged to be “completely gung-ho” and “incandescent with rage” with I am A Movie star.

David Haye is reportedly planning to sue ITV for £10m (Picture: ITV/Shutterstock)
David Haye is reportedly planning to launch a £10million lawsuit towards ITV. The previous heavyweight champion is alleged to have enlisted a authorized staff, claiming the enhancing of I am A Movie star… South Africa has triggered “irreparable harm to his model”. It’s alleged by The Solar that Haye’s solicitors have fired off a letter to ITV, which broadcasts the programme, demanding a full investigation into how the ultimate edit was decided. Regardless of the I am A Celeb spin-off being pre-recorded, the 45-year-old confronted a fierce backlash after making a collection of sexist remarks.
In a single significantly notable scene, he labelled co-star and collection winner Adam Thomas “ineffective” after the Waterloo Highway actor defined he was too unwell to take part in a trial. Adam suffers from psoriatic arthritis, a situation which causes painful joint irritation and stiffness. Upon being knowledgeable of this, Haye declared he did not “give a s**t”.
We use your sign-up to offer content material in methods you’ve got consented to and to enhance our understanding of you. This will embody adverts from us and third events primarily based on our understanding. You’ll be able to unsubscribe at any time. Learn our Privateness Coverage
He additional shocked his fellow campmates with a string of sexist remarks. Talking about his girlfriend Sian, who works as a mannequin, he commented: “She’s like tall, blue eyes. She’s beautiful. She’s bought the persona of a correct ugly chook.” He went on to counsel that “ugly women” have to have “a persona and banter,” to miss “the truth that they are not aesthetically superb”.

David Haye is alleged to really feel like he is been made the scapegoat (Picture: ITV)
“David is completely gung-ho about all of this – he’s incandescent with rage about how the entire collection has been dealt with and feels he is being made a scapegoat by ITV,” a supply instructed The Solar. The supply continued to claim that Haye believes he was purposefully edited to look confrontational. The supply additional claimed that David is “none of these” and has subsequently confronted on-line abuse because the programme was transmitted throughout the nation, studies the Mirror.
One occasion entails a comment that body-shamed Gemma Collins. The fact persona knowledgeable her fellow campmates that her hair was thick, to which David responded: “It undoubtedly ain’t skinny.” He purportedly believes that this constituted “intelligent enhancing”. The supply added that his authorized representatives might be inspecting the whole collection to establish additional cases.
“He’s going for damages on account of the ‘propaganda’ aired towards him to get well misplaced earnings, which legal professionals consider might complete as much as £10million,” the supply claimed. It is alleged that discussions David was conducting with Netflix relating to a programme and different industrial partnerships have been suspended following the controversy surrounding him.
Haye is not the only real particular person consulting a authorized agency. Former footballer Jimmy Bullard can also be reported to be considering pursuing authorized motion towards the programme and believes he was “sitched up” by ITV throughout the closing edit, alleging that in his dispute with Adam Thomas, ITV by no means broadcast Adam calling Jimmy a “c***.” Host Ant McPartlin subsequently confirmed on air that this scene was unsuitable for broadcasting.
“He needed everybody to see the stunning unedited model of the battle,” a supply beforehand claimed. The insider alleges that Bullard was “vastly dissatisfied” with presenters Ant and Dec, and that Gemma additionally let him down by taking Adam’s facet — regardless of not having witnessed their authentic confrontation firsthand.
“He’s speaking to legal professionals and searching into his ITV contract to see what grounds there are to sue,” the supply added.
















Leave a Reply