A council could possibly be the primary in England to cost extra for bigger automobiles

Bathtub and North East Somerset Council already faces a backlash over the proposal (Picture: SWNS)
Drivers in one of many UK’s most historic cities may face “SUV tax” parking fees primarily based on how huge their automobiles are. Bathtub and North East Somerset Council (B&NES) has begun consulting the general public over modifications to parking in Bathtub – and is already dealing with a backlash.
The authority’s plans cowl a wide range of parking points, similar to requiring a legitimate MOT for parking permits and rising the prices of customer permits. However essentially the most eye-catching is a proposal to cost locals for permits associated to the scale of their automobiles – a primary in England.
We use your sign-up to supply content material in methods you’ve got consented to and to enhance our understanding of you. This may increasingly embody adverts from us and third events primarily based on our understanding. You possibly can unsubscribe at any time. Learn our Privateness Coverage
- HMRC confirms state pension tax change rule for all state pensioners
- ‘Rachel Reeves has simply gone utterly crazy – will bankrupt Britain much more’
This might imply supplementary fees for some bigger autos, and reductions for smaller autos. An identical scheme was launched in Cardiff final yr.
Some residents have hit out, arguing the “outrageous” plans will goal households and folks with disabilities, who typically want bigger automobiles.
Bob, 63, a former taxi driver, stated: “I used to be driving on this city for 20 years and on the time I needed to pay one thing like £80 to 100 for residential parking.
“If that weren’t dangerous sufficient, they then add harm to insult by saying, ‘now we’ll cost you by the scale of your automotive as nicely.’ The issues they’re doing do not make sense.
“I would not thoughts a lot, however they don’t seem to be bettering the general public transport system.”
He added: “I do not assume it may enhance the congestion within the metropolis, as a result of it would not matter how a lot they put the fees up – folks will nonetheless pay the fees. Individuals will nonetheless come into the centre of city as a result of they should, to operate.”

Opinion concerning the measure is split amongst guests and locals (Picture: Getty)
Some locals have been in favour of the proposal, together with Jayne Mallon, additionally 63, who stated: “I feel it is a good suggestion. Greater autos ought to pay extra – they take up extra space and provides out extra air pollution.”
Tina Kerr, 56, from Warminster, Wiltshire, stated she thinks the principles are nice – however that they want higher public transport in place if they will make parking tough.
She stated: “It’s nice to kind out the parking points, however it wants an built-in transport system to switch folks driving in. We don’t have a handy different.”
Julian Knight, 51, travels to Bathtub a number of occasions a yr together with his household, as his brother lives domestically. He stated: “From a customer’s perspective, the parking fees appear fairly excessive already – we paid £50 for 2 nights.”
He added: “We might most likely nonetheless go to, as a result of we’re coming to see household – however it will be a much bigger hit on the pockets.”
Councillor Joel Hirst, Cupboard Member for Sustainable Transport Technique, stated: “The best way we handle parking has a direct influence on street security, equity, and the council’s potential to take care of important companies.
“What we’ve proposing to do will assist us obtain this. Larger fees for bigger autos and reductions for smaller ones will encourage extra folks to make use of safer, smaller and cleaner autos, which can even assist enhance air high quality.”
A earlier council session confirmed 50% of respondents supported introducing measurement‑primarily based fees or reductions for residents’ parking permits. The present session is open till June 18.
















Leave a Reply