The BBC is making a mockery of itself.
Tom Skinner has repeatedly embarrassed the BBC (Picture: BBC)
The BBC give Thomas Skinner a platform time and time once more – and each single time it has been left choosing up the items. It is like he has a hidden agenda to make a mockery of the publicly-funded broadcaster, and but it continues to present him airtime, for causes unknown.
From Strictly to The Apprentice and now even Query Time, evidently the broadcaster by no means learns its lesson with the very vocal mouthpiece. The TV character shot to fame after showing on the 2019 sequence of The Apprentice as a “cheeky chap” market dealer from Essex along with his signature “bosh” catchphrase. Nevertheless, it later got here to gentle that again in 2011, earlier than his TV debut, Skinner was convicted of dealing with £40,000 in stolen items as a part of his enterprise promoting merchandise at markets and possessing 2,000 diazepam tablets.
The TV contestant maintains that he was unaware the inventory was stolen as a result of it was from a supply he didn’t know. Then, simply a few years later, regardless of being declared because the “actual winner” of his sequence, the businessman bumped into monetary difficulties. In 2025, the Each day Mirror reported that his agency, The Fluffy Pillow Firm, “has not paid again a £50,000 Covid bounce again mortgage” and went on to state that “Firms Home has issued 4 notices to liquidate the agency with the excellent debt. Two strike-offs have been discontinued, presumably for administrative causes, and two have been suspended due to an objection.”
Tom Skinner was eradicated from Strictly first (Picture: BBC)
His continued controversy makes a mockery out of the success of The Apprentice, however then the BBC determined that it was nonetheless a good suggestion to present him an opportunity on one in all its largest exhibits – Strictly Come Dancing.
In 2025, he was paired up with Welsh skilled dancer Amy Dowden. They have been the primary couple to be eradicated from the competitors within the second week and this hit an actual nerve with Skinner – who went on to show himself to be the most important sore loser recognized.
Because of his elimination, Skinner claimed that the vote was rigged and can be pursuing authorized motion in opposition to the BBC – however the broadcaster denied any motion had been taken.
Skinner claimed that he was despatched an “nameless e-mail claiming to be from a BBC exec with stats” that confirmed he had “obtained much more votes than it appeared”.
However a BBC spokesperson rejected the allegation, saying Strictly’s public vote was “independently overseen and verified to make sure full accuracy”. They added: “Any claims on the contrary are fully with out basis.”
Regardless of him spitting his dummy out and attempting to make an entire mockery of the BBC, they nonetheless gave him one more probability when he was a panellist on Query Time this final week. He later bragged about being paid “£2,000” to affix the panel alongside Fiona Bruce.
Nevertheless, as soon as extra the BBC was pressured to defend itself in opposition to his claims, after backlash on-line. A BBC supply clarified: “Tom will not be a politician. Non-politicians who seem on the panel obtain a small quantity, nowhere close to the hundreds.”
They added that the political programme “doesn’t pay any elected and serving politicians (together with friends) any charge in any respect,” and it solely pays those that aren’t politicians a charge of £150.
Evaluation, gossip and upcoming present releases plus chosen gives and competitors Subscribe Invalid e-mail
We use your sign-up to supply content material in methods you have consented to and to enhance our understanding of you. This will likely embody adverts from us and third events primarily based on our understanding. You’ll be able to unsubscribe at any time. Learn our Privateness Coverage
Whereas Skinner has been outed time and time once more for letting his mouth run away with him and being caught in lies, it’s the BBC that’s the actual joke. The broadcaster is all the time beneath scrutiny for being funded by the licence charge so why would it not need to make itself look even much less credible?
If its plan is to break the status of a person who threatened to sue them, then it truly is backfiring. The BBC is slicing off its nostril to spite its face – I feel it is time that it learnt its lesson earlier than risking extra ridicule.
Leave a Reply