French defender Jeremy Jacquet made his Rennes return on Tuesday night after agreeing a £60million summer season transfer to Liverpool.

Jeremy Jacquet returned to Rennes after agreeing to his summer season Liverpool transfer (Picture: Getty)
Jeremy Jacquet returned to motion for Rennes on Tuesday evening following his settlement to hitch Liverpool in a deal finalised through the January switch window. However the 20-year-old endured a troublesome comeback.
The Frenchman is thought to be one among Europe’s most promising younger defenders and after attracting curiosity from a number of English golf equipment, he pledged his future to Liverpool on deadline day. Jacquet will full his £60million transfer in the summertime. Till then, he stays with Rennes and flew again simply in time to characteristic of their French Cup last-16 tie towards Marseille after present process his Liverpool medical. However Jacquet’s return bought off to the worst attainable begin as his facet fell behind inside two minutes.
Taking part in in a again 5, Rennes have been comprehensively overwhelmed 3-0 with Amine Gouiri, Mason Greenwood and Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang all discovering the online. French media have weighed in, with the defender’s substantial switch price turning into a speaking level.
GFNF
Jacquet was instantly thrust again into motion towards Marseille and predictably, his impending Liverpool switch means better scrutiny and heightened expectations encompass him.
GFNF significantly highlighted that this price ticket might show problematic for Jacquet, who struggled through the cup match and appeared positionally unsure at numerous factors all through the sport.
“Now he is been purchased by Liverpool, the price-tag is already hanging over every efficiency with supporters of the Reds watching,” the outlet wrote. “His superior positions on the ball have been fascinating however he seemed uncovered defensively within the second half, particularly with Greenwood’s tempo on the counter-attack.”

Jacquet returned towards Marseille (Picture: Getty)
Ouest-France
Each day newspaper Ouest-France was significantly much less important of Jacquet, highlighting his management qualities. However, additionally they felt his positioning wanted enchancment and awarded him simply 4/10 for his efficiency.
Ouest-France wrote: “The Liverpool recruit was there sporting the quantity 6 shirt, however positioned because the deep anchor of the five-man defence.
“He took accountability for the preliminary build-up play and performed the function of a frontrunner, exemplified by a significant intervention within the forty fifth minute. He was drawn out of place for the second purpose, however he constantly stepped up for a very long time regardless of the circumstances.”

Marseille’s assault was an excessive amount of for Rennes to deal with (Picture: Getty)
RFI
Likewise, RFI criticised Jacquet for his involvement within the second purpose and was significantly damning when assessing Rennes’ defending total, describing them as “scrappy.”
RFI wrote: “It took Marseille 75 seconds to attain in the beginning. It took them simply 31 seconds to double their lead after the restart. Gouiri discovered Greenwood racing by means of an undefended inside-right channel. The English attacker superior into the field and slotted into the far nook.
Liverpool FC information, fixtures, outcomes and switch gossip plus chosen provides and competitions Subscribe Invalid e-mail
We use your sign-up to offer content material in methods you’ve got consented to and to enhance our understanding of you. This will likely embody adverts from us and third events primarily based on our understanding. You’ll be able to unsubscribe at any time. Learn our Privateness Coverage
“New Liverpool recruit Jacquet, who had been caught upfield, gestured in bewilderment at his fellow Rennes defenders. Rennes didn’t be taught.
“Within the 82nd minute of a scrappy match, Greenwood once more discovered an enormous area in the identical space. This time he squared to substitute Aubameyang who scored.”

















Leave a Reply