Catrine Jarman says claims of an affair made by Earl Spencer’s ex-wife are ‘hurtful’ and unfaithful.

Charles, Earl Spencer, and Catrine Jarman met when she was filiming at Althorp (Picture: Getty)
The girlfriend of Prince Harry‘s uncle, Earl Spencer, has denied claims their relationship started after they have been each married. In a court docket case, Charles, Earl Spencer, was accused by his ex-wife, Countess Karen Spencer, of getting an affair with Catrine Jarman earlier than telling her in a textual content message despatched in March 2024 that their marriage was over, a declare Earl Spencer denies.
Ms Jarman denied claims that the romance with Earl Spencer started after they have been each married. She mentioned that each her marriage and the Earl’s have been over by the point their relationship started. The Norwegian archaeologist mentioned placing the accusations in authorized paperwork the place they might be reported with out there being a libel danger was “hurtful”.
We use your sign-up to offer content material in methods you’ve got consented to and to enhance our understanding of you. This will embody adverts from us and third events primarily based on our understanding. You’ll be able to unsubscribe at any time. Learn our Privateness Coverage
She advised the Mail on Sunday: “I feel I occurred to be within the fallacious place on the fallacious time, and it is extremely hurtful when there isn’t the slightest ingredient of reality in it. It simply feels actually pointless, and the very fact it was so public. It’s simply upsetting.”
Countess Karen Spencer was sued by Ms Jarman in 2024 over allegations that she misused the archaeologist’s non-public data by disclosing particulars of her analysis of a number of sclerosis (MS) to others.
In a unilateral assertion learn in open court docket final Thursday, legal professionals for Ms Jarman mentioned Countess Spencer had agreed to settle the declare in August final 12 months, however with none admission of legal responsibility or wrongdoing.
The phrases of the settlement weren’t disclosed on the listening to, at which Countess Spencer didn’t seem and was not represented.
Earl Spencer, 61, and Ms Jarman, 43, met in 2021 when she labored at his ancestral residence, Althorp, for a Channel 4 documentary.
Ms Jarman mentioned she had been separated from her husband, Tom Jarman, “for years”, however they saved it to themselves in order to not upset their kids.

Charles, Earl Spencer, is Prince Harry and Prince William’s maternal uncle (Picture: Getty)
The archaeologist mentioned she and Earl Spencer, Princess Diana’s brother, had been mates for a very long time earlier than their relationship developed.
After settling the Excessive Courtroom declare, Ms Jarman mentioned: “I’m delighted to have the ability to transfer on with my life now.”
She continued: “Your medical data is your personal, and individuals are not allowed to take a position on that or share it.”
Solicitor Dina Shiloh, for Ms Jarman, had advised the court docket her consumer beforehand solely shared her analysis with “a really small and trusted circle of individuals”.
Ms Shiloh mentioned Countess Spencer was advised about Ms Jarman’s analysis in a dialog together with her husband, Mr Jarman, in April 2024. Ms Jarman was separated from him on the time.
She continued that Countess Spencer then disclosed the data to others “whereas passing her personal commentary upon it” and was unable to offer a listing of individuals she had advised, inflicting Ms Jarman “huge pressure and anxiousness”.
A spokesperson for the countess mentioned following the listening to that she had been “threatened with a number of authorized claims” by Ms Jarman and Earl Spencer, which she believed have been “co-ordinated”.
Keep up-to-date with the newest Royal information Be a part of us on WhatsApp
Our neighborhood members are handled to particular presents, promotions, and adverts from us and our companions. You’ll be able to take a look at at any time. Learn our Privateness Coverage
They continued that Countess Spencer accepted the settlement supply “with no admission of legal responsibility or wrongdoing”, as “Earl Spencer could be required to indemnify her for the prices related to accepting” the settlement.
They mentioned: “Countess Spencer has exercised restraint all through and has restricted what she has mentioned publicly.
“Presently, she doesn’t intend to debate these issues past the few factors she feels you will need to spotlight on this assertion for the aim of context and accuracy. She considers the matter closed.”
Earl Spencer mentioned after the listening to: “Cat has dealt with each facet of this with grace, integrity and quiet braveness. She sought solely what was her proper: the identical proper to privateness that each individual deserves.
“A number of sclerosis is a critical situation; its course is unsure, and its calls for are important. Those that reside with the situation deserve full management over when, how and to whom they select to reveal it.”
On his former spouse’s declare about ending their relationship in a textual content message, Earl Spencer mentioned: “The notion I’d finish my marriage by textual content is an absurd try and blacken my identify. Karen ended the wedding, after infinite threats to take action through the years, in early March.
“She requested me to substantiate the tip of the wedding in a textual content of March 18 and my reply that day was a easy acceptance of her determination. I’ve these texts nonetheless, and can share them in court docket after I clear my identify.”
Mr Jarman mentioned in an announcement issued after the listening to that he “didn’t envisage” data disclosed to Countess Spencer “may need change into public”.
He mentioned: “Their disclosure has been distressing and has had a considerably dangerous influence on all concerned and on Cat specifically. This can be a supply of giant private remorse… Any non-public hypothesis round Cat’s situation was simply that: non-public.”


















Leave a Reply