Individuals used to say PM was a good man, however he is as dodgy as they arrive, writes Harvey Jones
PM Sir Keir Starmer tried rigging the electoral system, and could not even handle that (Picture: Getty)
We’ve had countless examples of how he’ll say no matter fits him on the time, with out giving a rattling whether or not it’s true, or whether or not it would come again to chew him later. I keep in mind him posing for footage with the Waspi girls whereas in opposition, claiming to help their marketing campaign for quick and honest compensation. I warned on the time he didn’t imply it, and he duly dropped them like a stone after profitable energy.
He’s finished it repeatedly. Through the election, he repeatedly claimed he wouldn’t hike taxes, then with the assistance of Rachel Reeves, Labour went to city. In August final yr, I drew up a listing of his greatest whoppers. I shortly got here up with 25. You may learn all of them right here however a phrase of warning: they might make your blood boil.
We use your sign-up to offer content material in methods you’ve got consented to and to enhance our understanding of you. This will embrace adverts from us and third events primarily based on our understanding. You may unsubscribe at any time. Learn our Privateness Coverage
In January, the Categorical counted 13 Starmer U-turns, and we’ve seen a continuing stream since. At this time, there’s one other. And this one is traditional Sir Keir. It additionally affords an unpleasant perception into how far Labour will go to seize votes and tilt the system in its favour.
In Could 2024, within the run-up to the overall election, Starmer stated he needed to present 16 and 17-year-olds the suitable to vote. It was slammed as a blatant try at stacking the election in Labour’s favour. Which it clearly was. Now it appears to be like much more corrupt.
The transfer would have handed round 1.5 million kids the vote. And the motivation was clear. Youthful persons are extra more likely to again Labour, if they are often bothered getting away from bed on the day.
It was a shameless piece of political calculation. Teenagers may be splendidly brilliant and idealistic, however they’re simply swayed and weak to see stress.
At this time, it is emerged that Labour has reportedly shelved plans to push by way of laws giving votes to 16-year-olds. Why? As a result of they’ve immediately realised the Inexperienced Celebration, not Labour, would be the essential beneficiary.
Labour is scared of the Greens, as left-wing voters abandon the celebration and flock to the wildly charismatic demagogue Zack Polanski, simply as they fell for Jeremy Corbyn earlier than him. Polanski is precisely the form of politician who appeals to youthful voters. His radical concepts sound nice on social media, however could be a catastrophe in follow.
Open borders, legalising medicine, wealth taxes, ever extra spending (besides on defence), all wrapped up in advantage signalling and intolerance of dissenting views. In fact younger persons are drawn to that. Its insurance policies are insane, however they’re much more thrilling than stodgy outdated Starmer.
Even our dozy PM has woken as much as the chance. Labour hoped to reap younger individuals’s votes. As a substitute, votes at 16 will feed the Greens. So the coverage has been ditched. Together with all of the cynical, self-serving arguments Starmer used to justify the change. What a crooked method to run a celebration, and a rustic.
We’ve seen the identical sample with Labour earlier than, as Starmer blocked an investigation into the grooming gangs scandal as a result of he feared shedding the Muslim vote. Starmer. First rate? He is as dodgy as they arrive.
Leave a Reply