The Duke of Sussex is going through a recent headache concerning certainly one of his charities.

Prince Harry has misplaced certainly one of his charity’s board members (Picture: Getty)
Prince Harry is alleged to be on the verge of a “second heartbreak” after a key member of certainly one of his beloved charities resigned. The Duke of Sussex is alleged to be going through a brand new headache with the Invictus Video games after a significant resignation passed off.
Melloney Poole has stepped down as a trustee and vice chairman of the Invictus Video games board for subsequent 12 months’s occasion in Birmingham. Her web page is now not accessible on the Invictus Video games 2027 web site.
We use your sign-up to supply content material in methods you have consented to and to enhance our understanding of you. This may increasingly embrace adverts from us and third events based mostly on our understanding. You’ll be able to unsubscribe at any time. Learn our Privateness Coverage
Poole, who has been described as “instrumental” for the Invictus workforce, presently chairs the Florence Nightingale Basis. She turned vice chairman of the Invictus Video games board in December 2024, in what an enormous win for the charity.

Prince Harry is heading to Birmingham for the Invictus Video games 2027 (Picture: Getty)
However now a charity spokesperson has confirmed her departure and stated she desires to give attention to “different pursuits,” just some months earlier than subsequent 12 months’s Invictus Video games.
They instructed the Each day Mail: “Melloney has determined to step all the way down to give attention to her different pursuits – not least the Florence Nightingale Basis.”
The spokesperson added that Ms Melloney’s “in depth management expertise” had been “instrumental” in establishing the foundations for subsequent 12 months’s video games.”
It comes as earlier this 12 months, Harry was sued for defamation by one other certainly one of his beloved charities, from which he stepped down, Sentebale
Excessive Courtroom filings confirmed that the Duke of Sussex is a defendant in a libel or slander declare alongside Mark Dyer, a former trustee.
Sentebale launched a defamation motion in opposition to Prince Harry over what the charity stated was a “co-ordinated opposed media marketing campaign” which precipitated “operational disruption and reputational hurt”, its board of trustees stated.
In an announcement, its board of trustees and govt director stated: “Sentebale has commenced authorized proceedings within the Excessive Courtroom of England and Wales.
“Sentebale has skilled the opposed media marketing campaign as false narratives circulated by the media in regards to the charity and its management, makes an attempt to undermine its relationships with workers, present and potential companions, and the pressured diversion of management time and assets into managing a reputational disaster not of the charity’s making.”
The Duke of Sussex and ex-Sentebale trustee Mark Dyer “categorically reject these offensive and damaging claims”, a spokesperson for the pair stated.
Founders Harry and Prince Seeiso beforehand stepped down because the charity’s patrons in assist of a gaggle of trustees who resigned after a dispute with the chairwoman of the board of trustees, Dr Sophie Chandauka.
The Charity Fee subsequently revealed a report into the episode, criticising all sides for making the fallout public with interviews and statements.
“The charity seeks the courtroom’s intervention, safety and restitution following a coordinated opposed media marketing campaign carried out since March 25, 2025, that has precipitated operational disruption and reputational hurt to the charity, its management and its strategic companions.
“The proceedings have been introduced in opposition to Prince Harry and Mark Dyer, recognized by proof because the architects of that opposed media marketing campaign, which has had important viral impression and triggered an onslaught of cyber-bullying directed on the charity and its management.


















Leave a Reply